Plans occupational of pension granted by enterprises grouped in camera commercial
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35319/y3djbx68Keywords:
Social security pensions, Savings, social security, compensationAbstract
Occupational pension schemes are benefits that companies give their workers in different countries, complement or add social security pensions granted by the social security systems, may be mandatory, voluntary, or quasi-obligatory. They are a pillar of the system for financial protection in old age proposed by the World Bank. In Mexico, this provision, which is voluntary, is found mainly in transnational corporations and protects a small number of workers to social security the most important social security system pensions model is pure defined contribution and which are nowhere that improvements in its design spite. In this document is presents a proposed for companies grouped in cameras commercial that meet certain features to be affordable to a greater number of workers and companies and that adheres aspects that added advantages for both parties in the context Mexican.
Downloads
References
Albarrán, E. (2016, 28 de febrero). Consar pide no descartar las propuestas de la OCDE. El Economista. Recuperado de http://eleconomista.com.mx/sistema-financiero/2016/02/28/consar-pide-no-descartar-las-propuestas-ocde el 10 de mayo de 2016.
Alonso, J., Hoyo, C., & Tuesta, D. (2015). A model for the pension system in Mexico: diagnosis and recommendations. Journal on Pension Economics and Finance, 14. https://doi.org/10.1017/S147474721400016x
Beram, G. (2006). The emergence of occupational pensions in Korea. 28th International Congress of Actuaries. Paris.
Broadbent, J., Palumbo, M., & Woodman, E. (2006). The shift from DB to DC pensions plans: implication for asset allocation and risk management. Recuperado de http://www.bis.org/publ/wgpapers/cgfs27broadbent3.pdf el 12 de mayo de 2015.
Brown, Robert L., & Liu, Jianxun. (2001). The shift to defined contribution pension plans: why did it not happen in Canada? North American Actuarial Journal, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/10920277.2001.10595999
CONSAR. (2015). Estadísticas del registro electrónico de planes privados ante la CONSAR 2015.
Ezra, D. (2011). The Dutch pension system. Benefits Quarterly, 27(4).
Flores, Z. (2015, 27 de agosto). 90% de empresas transforman liquidación en plan de jubilación. El Financiero. Recuperado de http://www.elfinanciero.com.mx/economia/90-de-empresas-transforman-liquidacion-en-plan-de-jubilacion.html el 15 de mayo de 2016.
Ham Chande, R. (2010). Envejecimiento demográfico. En García, Brígida & Ordorica, Manuel (Eds.) Los grandes problemas de México. I Población (pp. 53-78). México: El Colegio de México. Recuperado de http://2010.colmex.mx/16tomos/I.pdf el 30 de abril de 2016.
Lozano Nathal, C. (2009). Desarrollo de los planes privados de pensiones en México. Recuperado de http://www.amac.org.mx/vision/ el 25 de octubre de 2014.
Mercer. (2011). Introduction to benefit plans around the world. A guide for multinational employers. Recuperado de http://www.mercer.com/articles/1277030 el 20 de marzo de 2013.
Morales Ramírez, M. A. (2009). Modelos de financiamiento de las pensiones. (Tesis de Doctorado en Derecho, UNAM).
Moreno Padilla, J. (2010). Reestructura del régimen de pensiones. Revista Latinoamericana de Derecho Social, 10.
Morgan, L. (2013). Collective DC – digging a deeper hole. Recuperado de http://www.schroders.com/tp/assetclass/property?id=a0j50000002yZXDAA2 el 25 de septiembre de 2014.
Munnell, A., Quinby, L., & Webb, A. (2012). What’s the tax advantage of 401(K)s? (Brief 12-4). Recuperado del sitio de Center for Retirement Research at Boston College: http://crr.bc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/IB_12-4-508.pdf el 11 de enero de 2016.
OCED. (2009). OCDE Pensions Outlook 2008, OCDE Publishing.
OCED. (2011). Pensions at a glance 2011: Retirement-income systems in OCDE and G20 Countries. Recuperado de http://www.dgaep.gov.pt/upload//RIareas/Pensions_at_a_glance_2011.pdf el 18 de marzo de 2016.
OCED. (2012). OCDE Pensions Outlook 2012, OCDE Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264169401-en
OCED. (2015a). Pensions at a glance 2013: OCDE and G20 Indicators, OCDE Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/pension_glance-2015-en
OCED. (2015b). OECD reviews of pension systems Mexico, OCDE Publishing.
Oxera. (2008). Defined-contribution pension schemes. Risk and advantages for occupational retirement provision.
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, Secretary of Labor & Secretary of the Treasury. (2013). Multiemployer pension plans. Report to congress required by the pension protection act 2006. Recuperado de http://www.pbgc.gov/documents/pbgc-report-multiemployer-pension-plans.pdf el 15 de octubre de 2015.
Ponds, Eduard H. M., & Van Riel, Bart. (2007). Sharing risk: The Netherlands’ new approach to pensions (Brief 2007-5). Recuperado del sitio de Center for Retirement Research at Boston College: http://crr.bc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/ib_2007-5.pdf el 25 de enero de 2015.
Sender, Samuel. (2012). Shifting towards hybrid pension systems: a European perspective.
Smart, L. (2012). Can collective pension schemes work in the United Kingdom? Pensions, 17(4).
Society of Actuaries. (2010). Retirement 20/20: new design for a new century. Recuperado de http://retirement2020.soa.org/Files/2012-new-designs-soa.pdf el 18 de marzo de 2015.
Torres, Y. (2013, 23 de enero). Urge regulación profunda para planes privados. El Economista. Recuperado de http://eleconomista.com.mx/finanzas-publicas/2013/01/23/urge-regulacion-profunda-planes-privados el 25 de mayo de 2013.
Uthoff, A. (2002). Mercados de trabajo y sistemas de pensiones. Revista de la CEPAL, 78.
Villagómez, A. (2015). México: un esquema multipilar fragmentado. En Cómo fortalecer los sistemas de pensiones latinoamericanos tomo II (pp. 293–362). Chile: Sura Asset Management.
Whiterford, P., & Whitehouse, E. (2006). Pension Challenges and pension reforms in OCDE Countries. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grj006
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Revista Perspectivas
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
La Revista Perspectivas de la Universidad Católica Boliviana, es una revista de acceso abierto, por lo tanto, es de libre acceso en su integridad. Está permitida su lectura, búsqueda, descarga, distribución y reutilización legal en cualquier tipo de soporte únicamente para fines no comerciales, siempre y cuando la obra sea debidamente citada.
