Desentrañando el enigma de la productividad académica: Factores clave entre los investigadores de la Universidad Católica Boliviana.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35319/perspectivas.202657301Palabras clave:
Productividad, Redes, Investigación, BoliviaResumen
Estudios sobre los factores que inciden en la productividad de los investigadores en contextos de pobreza como es el caso de Bolivia son escasos. La presente investigación busca encontrar los determinantes de la productividad de los investigadores de la Universidad Católica Boliviana. Para tal efecto, planteamos una investigación del tipo cuantitativo para determinar los impactos de los determinantes de la productividad. Después de haber corrido varios modelos econométricos, encontramos que contar con redes de contacto diversificadas, participar de forma regular en conferencias internacionales y tener acceso a diversos recursos incrementa la productividad de los investigadores. Los resultados de esta investigación contribuyen a la teoría de redes sociales y capital social, al demostrar que la concentración de redes de coautoría actúa como un freno estructural a la innovación y visibilidad académica, especialmente en contextos emergentes como Bolivia.
Descargas
Referencias
Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Solazzi, M. (2011). The relationship between scientists’ research performance and the degree of internationalization of their research. Scientometrics, 86(3), 629-643.
Ali, S., Cardozo, C., & Singh, A. (2023). Gender differences in academic openness and collaboration: Evidence from bibliometric data. Scientometrics, 128(4), 2105–2125.
Andersen, J. P., Nielsen, M. W., & Londa, N. (2023). Gender differences in publication rates and citation impact across disciplines: A large-scale analysis of Scopus data. Journal of Informetrics, 17(2), Article 101398.
Asubiaro, T., Badmus, O., & Oluwole, O. (2024). Global disparities in scholarly publishing: Representation of low- and middle-income countries in Scopus and Web of Science. Scientometrics, 129(3), 1457–1483
Auza, C., Santiváñez, M., & Dorta, A. (2020). Análisis de la producción científica y la colaboración internacional boliviana indexada en Scopus entre 1996-2018. Revista Cubana de Investigaciones Biomédicas, 39(3).
Babu, A., & Singh, Y. (1998). Determinants of research productivity. Scientometrics, 43, 309-329. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02457402.
Ballesteros, J., De Saá, P., García, N., Martín, F., & Sánchez, G. (2020). Exploring the determinants of scientific productivity: a proposed typology of researchers. Journal of Intellectual Capital. https://doi.org/10.1108/jic-07-2019-0178
Bonilla, C., Rivera, I., & Rivera, O. (2024). Conditioning factors for the scientific productivity of undergraduate students of health sciences at a private Peruvian University: A cross-sectional analytical study. F1000Research, 13(5). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.143021.1
Bramwell, A., Hepburn, N., & Wolfe, D. A. (2008). Growing clusters to create competitive advantages: The role of universities in fostering knowledge-based economic development. Journal of Regional Analysis & Policy, 38(3), 251–267.
D’Angelo, C. A., van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2015). Measuring the impact of research: A bibliometric analysis of journal-level metrics. Journal of Informetrics, 9(3), 562–576.
De Leon, R., & McQuillin, B. (2020). The role of conferences in the academic career: Evidence from economics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 34(3), 141–162.
Frandsen, T. F., Jacobsen, R. H., & Ousager, J. (2020). Gender gaps in scientific performance: a longitudinal matching study of health sciences researchers. Scientometrics, 124(2), 1511-1527.
Fukuzawa, N. (2014). An empirical analysis of the relationship between individual characteristics and research productivity. Scientometrics, 99(3), 785-809.
Gantman, E. (2012). Economic, linguistic, and political factors in the scientific productivity of countries. Scientometrics, 93, 967-985. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0736-3
Gorodnichenko, Y., Pham, T., & Talavera, O. (2021). Conference presentations and publication success: Evidence from economics. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 183, 1–18.
Hamilton, L. C. (1992). Regression with graphics: A second course in applied statistics. Duxbury Press.
Huber, P. J. (1973). Robust regression: Asymptotics, conjectures and Monte Carlo. The Annals of Statistics, 1(5), 799–821.
Hu, Z., Chen, C., & Liu, Z. (2014). How are collaboration and productivity correlated at various career stages of scientists?. Scientometrics, 101(2), 1553-1564.
Jiménez, B. (1992). Productividad en investigación del docente universitario [Research productivity of the university professor]. Espacios, 13(14). http://www.revistaespacios.com/a93v14n03/44931403.html
Katerndahl, D. A. (2000). Effect of attendance at an annual primary care research methods conference on research productivity and development. Family medicine, 32(10), 701-708.
Kendal, J. M. (2022). Teaching load and research productivity: Evidence from U.S. faculty. Higher Education, 84(5), 1025–1044.
King, M., & Frederickson, M. (2020). The Pandemic Penalty: The Gendered Effects of COVID-19 on Scientific Productivity. Socius, 7. https://doi.org/10.1177/23780231211006977
Kwiek, M., & Roszka, W. (2024). Are Scientists Changing their Research Productivity Classes When They Move Up the Academic Ladder? ArXiv, 50(1), 329-367. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2407.04200
Lee, S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). The Impact of Research Collaboration on Scientific Productivity. Social Studies of Science, 35, 673 - 702. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312705052359
Li, Y., Zhang, X., & Wang, J. (2022). Collaborative networks and scientific impact: A longitudinal analysis of co-authorship patterns. Scientometrics, 127(8), 4567–4592.
Li, Y., Zhang, X., & Wang, J. (2024). Disruptive innovation and career trajectories in science: A bibliometric study. Journal of Informetrics, 18(1), Article 101456.
Livia, J., Merino, C., & Livia, R. (2022). Producción científica en la base de datos Scopus de una Universidad privada del Perú. Rev. Digit. Invest. Docencia Univ, 16(1), 2223-2516.
Mezzetti, M., & Negri, I. (2024). Hierarchical Bayesian model to estimate and compare research productivity of Italian academic statisticians. Scientometrics, 129, 7443-7474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-05154-5
Myers, K. (2024). Administrative burdens and research productivity: Evidence from academic careers. Research Policy, 53(2), Article 104912.
National Science Foundation. (2023). Science and engineering indicators 2024. National Science Board. https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20243
Osare, F., & Keshvari, M. (2023). Evaluation of a Scientific Productivity Model among World Highly Cited Authors: a Study Based on Experts’ Opinions. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 15, 14452–14485 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01613-1
Ruiz, A., Cardona, A., Arrieta, O., Rolfo, C., Gómez, H., Raez, L., . . . Rosell, R. (2020). Scientific publications in cancer: in Latin America, strong scientific networks increase productivity (the TENJIN study). J Clin Epidemiol, 126, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.05.033
Palenque, G. (2024). La autoría e institucionalización de la producción científica de salud, publicada en revistas científicas bolivianas indexadas en bases de datos bibliográficos. Cuadernos Hospital de Clínicas, 65(1), 18-25. https://doi.org/10.53287/kbfx4996ay80z
Parish, A. J., Boyack, K. W., & Klavans, R. (2018). Scientific collaboration and team diversity: A longitudinal analysis. Scientometrics, 117(3), 1457–1480.
Rotolo, D., & Messeni Petruzzelli, A. (2013). When does centrality matter? Scientific productivity and the moderating role of research specialization and cross‐community ties. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(5), 648-670.
Rousseeuw, P. J., & Leroy, A. M. (1987). Robust regression and outlier detection. John Wiley & Sons.
Sabharwal, M. (2013). Comparing research productivity across disciplines and career stages. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 15(2), 141-163.
Sayyed, K. (2024). Assessing research productivity and quality across disciplines in the School of Arts and Sciences at the Lebanese American University. Sage Open, 14(1).
Sax, L. J., Hagedorn, L. S., Arredondo, M., & Dicrisi III, F. A. (2002). Faculty research productivity: Exploring the role of gender and family-related factors. Research in higher education, 43(4), 423-446.
Song, Y., & Gan, Y. (2022). International mobility activities predict research output: A longitudinal study. PsyCh Journal, 11(2), 235-246.
Stock, J. H., & Watson, M. W. (2015). Introduction to econometrics (3rd ed.). Pearson.
Tower, G., Plummer, J., & Ridgewell, B. (2007). A multidisciplinary study of gender-based research productivity in the world’s best journals. Journal of Diversity Management–Fourth Quarter, 2(4), 23-32.
Uyar, A., Kuzey, C., & Kilic Karamahmutoglu, M. (2022). Macroeconomic factors, R&D expenditure and research productivity in economics and finance. Managerial Finance, 48(5), 733-759.
Valero, A., & Van Reenen, J. (2019). The economic impact of universities: Evidence from across the globe. Economics of Education Review, 68, 53–67.
White, H. (1980). A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica, 48(4), 817–838.
Yadav, S., Kumar, A., & Singh, R. (2023). The impact of collaboration with star scientists on individual productivity: Evidence from bibliometric data. Scientometrics, 128(5), 2891–2915.
Yohai, V. J. (1987). High breakdown-point and high efficiency estimates for regression. The Annals of Statistics, 15(2), 642–665.
Yousefi-Nooraie, R., Akbari-Kamrani, M., Hanneman, R. A., & Etemadi, A. (2008). Factors influencing the production of co-authorship networks: The case of Iranian researchers. Scientometrics, 77(2), 255–272.
Zhang, S., Li, D., & Zhang, J. The Impact of National and International Collaboration Networks on Research Productivity. Available at SSRN 4657656.
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2026 Revista Perspectivas
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
La Revista Perspectivas de la Universidad Católica Boliviana, es una revista de acceso abierto, por lo tanto, es de libre acceso en su integridad. Está permitida su lectura, búsqueda, descarga, distribución y reutilización legal en cualquier tipo de soporte únicamente para fines no comerciales, siempre y cuando la obra sea debidamente citada.
